Search for: "OLIVA v. A " Results 1 - 20 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2008, 12:05 pm
Olivas, University of Houston Law Center, has posted a new essay, Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Olivas (University of Houston Law Center) & Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia (The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law) have posted Plyler v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 5:55 am by immigrationprof
Here is a practice advisory prepared by the NYU Immigration Law Clinic on the Third Circuit’s groundbreaking decision in Oliva-Ramos v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 5:55 am by immigrationprof
Here is a practice advisory prepared by the NYU Immigration Law Clinic on the Third Circuit’s groundbreaking decision in Oliva-Ramos v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm by immigrationprof
"Midday" with Dan Rodricks on WYPR's daily public affairs program today featured Professor Michael Olivas, author of No Undocumented Child Left Behind (2011). [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Immigration Prof
Olivas and Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia critically analyzed the legality of the Department of Homeland Security's recent DACA memo responding to the Supreme Court's decision in Dep’t of Homeland Security v.... [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:00 pm
"A jury convicted defendant Jose Rodriguez Olivas of 17 felony counts related to his continuous sexual abuse of M.M. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 6:51 pm by Bclalsa
Professor Olivas will discuss the litigation history of Hernandez v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 1:35 am by Immigration Prof
., forthcoming 2023). by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia and Michael Olivas With Michael having departed us, Shoba wrote the following abstract... [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 12:58 pm by Immigration Prof
Michael Olivas reminded the Immigration Law Professors listserve that that yesterday was the anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark 1982 decision in Plyer v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Second, Oliva comments on the Cato Institute’s legal position, which has now been detailed by Cato. [read post]